9.6.12

Art?

0082

2 comments:

Donny Duke (editor) said...

This post asks an important question quite well, and does so in the frame of modern art -- minimalist, sublime -- but by its very presentation you wouldn't call it art itself, or you wouldn't if you make a distinction between art and everything else, if you actually think something called art exists. I've written an essay on art and poetry called The Eye of God that also asks this question in a manner readers of this blog might be interested in. It's at: http://theeyeofchange.blogspot.in/
If you want to post the essay anywhere, or anything else that is on the blogspot (poetry review) just drop me a note at the.eye.of.change@gmail.com telling me you did so, putting the blogspot as the original source. You don't have to have permission.

Purple Cow said...

Beats me! I was surprised that a Aimee Davison paid $10,000 to buy a conceptual piece from the Museum of Non-Visible Art. What she actually purchased was air... an imagined work! I guess it's not just about beauty and talent but also about concepts and how revolutionary they are at a particular point in time in order to inspire a movement.

Related Posts with Thumbnails