
Statements like the following taken from a
recent interview place
Slavoj Žižek firmly within the
Speculative Realist camp:
“For the last few decades, at least in the humanities, big ontological questions - What is reality? What is the nature of the universe? - were considered too naive. It was meaningless to ask for objective truth. This prohibition on asking the big questions partly accounts for the explosion of popular science books. You read Stephen Hawking's books as a way to ask these fundamental, metaphysical questions. I think that era of relativism, where science was just another product of knowledge, is ending. We philosophers should join scientists asking those big metaphysical questions about quantum physics, about reality.”
My only objection here would be that we should be asking
post-metaphysical (radically empirical) questions as opposed to strictly
metaphysical questions. The difference makes all the difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment