5.1.15

to build from the actions of others?

Resonating bodies connect and coordinate through the mutual involvement of powers and capacities, intensifying and expanding, becoming more than parts and sums - carving niches and generating socialities from the actions of others. It's not about individuals or collectives, agency vs. structure, but about interdependent actions at multiple levels and with differential rhythms. Thinking the particular modes and movements of any existing ecology is about thinking the 'in-between' of individuals and groups via an ongoing engagement with the specificity of things.

Although I find the distinction between exteriority (the physical) and interiority (the mental) unhelpful and a bit distracting, in the quote below Adrian seems to clearly discern the importance of thinking how entities are always being and becoming-with other things as assemblages.
"An ant colony builds itself from the actions of its members: gathering leaf litter, sticks, bits and pieces of the environing world, tunneling, communicating, building, nursing. None of these ant “individuals,” not even the queen herself, could act in this way without the rest of the colony. Both the body and the mind of the colony—its “objective” parts, those we can see, describe, dissect, and measure, and its “subjective” parts, which are the moments of felt decision that turn an ant this way rather than that way in its crossing of a trail in a forest, or those that bring a team of ants together to haul a large leaf or dead grasshopper—these are all dispersed in space, they are spaced, detached from each other physically (or so it appears when we observe them), but mentally, in terms of the interactive processing of signs and relations, they are networked together into a coordinated collectivity. The network of the colony is not only made of those ant bodies, but also what they are capable of and what they do with things—with soil, leaves, sticks, pieces of food. By most objective measures, anthills are cities: they include complex systems of transportation, communication (pheromone-based), ventilation, sewage disposal, food production (the farming of plants, the growing of fungus, the raising of aphid cattle), cooperative labor, warfare, and slavery." - Adrian Ivakhiv

3 comments:

Mark Crosby said...

Michael, the quote from Adrian is timely as context for many of the articles available from www.american-philosophy.org/saap/2014 (HT Leon AFTER NATURE).

Just finished Charles Munitz's "Buchler and Buddhism Revisited", which somewhat takes Justus Buchler from behind (I think ; ) but gives a great summary of Buchler's METAPHYSICS OF NATURAL COMPLEXES that "accounts for all discriminables as natural complexes, multidimensional, inter-related vehicles of encounter, engagement, and appreciation... Through query, and successive judgment, the contour of a complex may be altered and the sense of its integrity refined". I think Munitz tries to impute some "essentialism" and "substantialism" to Buchler, but Buchler always takes pains to reject these characterizations. The quote you cite from Adrian is very close to something I read in Buchler recently but can no longer find.

Anyway, enough with the metaphysical stuff. My previous reference to "Supper's Ready", for those who didn't grow up with the progressive rock of the 1970s, is a 28-minute Genesis classic that retells the Biblical Book of Revelation:
* Original 1970s version performed by Peter Gabriel, with Phil Collins on percussion: Genesis - Supper's Ready (Live) - YouTube
* Several recent 2014 versions on YouTube performed by Genesis lead guitarist Steve Hackett and Genesis Revisited.

Key line for Neoreactionary Accelerationistas: "Pythagorias with the looking glass / reflects the full moon / In blood he's writing the lyrics / of a brand new tune".

P.S. Your "Scorpion Crown" reminds me of some COLLAPSE III & IV essays by Reza Negarestani.. Mark

Unknown said...

That's a hellava comment Mark :)

I'll have to check that link and song, like right now in fact.

Say, what's your take on NRx anyway? I can't for the life of me get a handle on what its trying to do..

Mark Crosby said...

Michael, when ethnicity is about cultural survival, eg, First Americans, I'm all for it as a liberation tool. However, too many of these NRx folks are just plain racist! Even if some aren't racist, the desire for a return to nobility and kings is elitist and fascist. I may share some of their criticisms of the "Cathedral" (meaning the Education and Science industries) but I'm totally committed to pluralism and a Whitmanesque fondness for Noise and Parasites.

I shouldn't have equated Neoreactionaries with Accelerationists. Still, even the Left Accelerationists we all know and love sometimes seem lost in a certain Lovecraftian Romanticism. I "meditated" with Extropians for about 10 years and can only wonder at how 19th-c some of these Accelerationistas seem!

Note: REVELATION SPACE is also a reference to the SF novels of Alastair Reynolds. The story-telling in his flagship 2000 novel of the series is horribly uneven; however, the underlying themes are BIG: Humanity's expansion across the galaxy has encountered two superior alien races: 1) The anarchist Pattern Jugglers (who drive people crazy ; ) and 2) the reactionary Inhibitors (who want to exterminate any uppity n*****s who try to take the stage).

Related Posts with Thumbnails