Ben Woodard of Naught Thought infamy has commented on the recent developments on the Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) and Whitehead front (which includes the ongoing debate between Ivakhiv and Bryant) here.
I found the following remark very poignant:
I found the following remark very poignant:
For me, flowing materialities, colliding events, interlocking processes, gathered contingencies and the particular stratifications (procedural 'machines') these produce stretch the boundaries of schematization in ways that seems to require a ‘going beyond’ any sort of dwelling on “objects”. I believe the world is much weirder and darker than objectological thinking seems to suggest.Ground is the important term in relating processes and procedures as it is places processes in localities (temporal and spatial) and suggests the importance of stratifications as replacing individuation – with Reza’s twist as a means of bypassing the stupidity of individuation as just a happening from process instead of the failure of multiple processes shifting back and forth between each other. The very interrelation between space and time is becoming-things where derivative forces carve particularities into event-things misdirecting/redirecting other processes.
2 comments:
Michael,
Thanks for the link and I think you're correct that process philosophy needs to be articulated in its weirdness and that the abstraction that has often accompanied it is not a necessity.
Also, one small clarification, my last name is spelled Woodard (only one 'w')...happens all the time.
I apologize for that Ben - noted and fixed.
I have been following your blog closely for some time now and I like the direction you are going with it. I think our world is more 'slimey' than either OOO or relationalism can capture...
Thanks for dropping by and letting me know. Cheers.
Post a Comment